When I talk about this in my lecture series on the cover in a course for the publishing industry that takes place in Milan, seeking to highlight its innovative character, and synthetic linear and its modernity, which in itself can add many of the elements of the recent history of the Italian cover. Sometimes I will talk about the "social history of the cover" as I see it and how to explain it in my lesson.
the series possess forty volumes, and when I happen to find someone in the library, I buy it regardless of title. I also treat yourself to some, as no 3, the beautiful autobiography of Darwin, which are pentitissimo have given away and I'm looking for years.
Leafing Prince for the post, I was wondering how I could, as a boy, read it zig-zagando street in Naples. We know that in Naples do not walk, but he walked: there is enough space and peace to meditate and reflect, the vibrant "population", as we say when we talk about the Neapolitan mob, you drag into its vortex, or you against it rains horizontally like a swarm of meteors that you do not understand the origin and direction, but whose presence is felt by all possible ways, for shouting against you, you move, you shake it before . Even the smell is safe, because of frying, the puffs of each coffee that you kidnap 'pontoon' or alley "(every street corner). Color? folklore? Maybe. But try to walk to Naples in the mid-seventies, and then let me know (and this is a slightly quieter period, the city traffic far less populated than it is today!).
a corner a bit 'was more comfortable to read to us kids Via Cesario Console, and then, via Nazario Sauro and, subsequently, Via Caracciolo. The sea is allowed to smooth the rest, so I thought several times that the sea in Naples has no other function than to serve a safety valve in the city: an open area where you throw all the waste, exhaustion, softening Various concerns, boats , screams, betrayals, desires, readings, desires and hopes we're all big enough.
I do not know how I managed to read Machiavelli in that situation, but perhaps the anxiety of reading was stronger than everything. I remember But surely the effect on me was reading this, that left me day after day (maybe I already said I'm a reader and patient bed, without harming the book, but let me accompany unhurried) a curious sensation discomfort. That search for friends tamed, weak enemies, alliances, non-invasive, that held that even in civil principality (ie where a popular consensus is essential) is not sufficient virtue or fortune, but we need "as soon as a successful ruse" ( p. 46)
diminishes me the image of high politics (I said that? Gosh, I do not think my keyboard!). I thought, a boy: Machiavelli great logician, but maybe our politicians of today do not need this incentive to deface the beautiful country. Maybe not wrong, and the discomfort I feel it still, when I see that governments are being built at a table with the cup of folly. Me I see the Chairman of the round with his Bussolotti: "this here, let me think, too authoritative and independent, may be a good ally, but also a potential enemy. Well, then give him the chairmanship of the House, as it institutionalizes and me take off my feet. That. Here, perfect for justice, I must a lot of favors and then not shine of its own, so it is perfect for a task responsibility (my) "
and so on. Small Machiavelli terrify me, because it upset the order of things and practice (no longer even the pretense of power as such, but with the claim of right in practice) the typical Machiavellian rule: "one has to note that men must cherish them or or off, because they take revenge for trifling offenses, not serious, so that the injured man that you ought not to be so that the theme of revenge "(p. 11).
Machiavelli is a lucid analyst dramatically, but the his invention of the policy corresponds to a locus of political technology, logic and ethics of civil (as there is also a logic in the moral dimension).
read Machiavelli, I've found, gives me the same way I feel uneasy in front of a monkey because I like too, I am brought back to the sphere of animal (friendly, scientifically sound, beautiful from a universal point of view of the union for which we are all similar, but still disconcerting). The Prince of Machiavelli, from the principles that govern us today, is in the same ratio of homo sapiens-sapiens with the monkey, only that the leaders are overthrown: the principles of today are the involution of the Machiavellian model, for which the cruelty and cunning tricks and redressing injuries were not legitimate and ethical standards civilians.
Machiavelli is one of those thinkers who I call the function (there are also thinkers of position): the invention of politics is the discovery of a specific use of reason, which is now space in the context of Renaissance culture, to govern the passions military, diplomatic and social, which had been subjected to opportunism or blind warrior from the will. The prince program calculates, distributes energy, fold men and things in a rational iron law: power. The reason in modern history progresses independently and regardless of the outcome reached by. Today, some think the reason that leads to relativism, but not quite so, because reason is the most definitive of human achievement: every step is undeniable and indelible. The real relativism is introduced when one attempts to counter the reason some other function (or other faith). In this fascinating aspect of Machiavelli for having to take another step to the right (so to speak), but at the same time dismayed by the instrumental use that has been made and does not regret a political logic, but maybe a bit 'more virtuous.
_____________
tie the jacket
The creation of the solitary inhabitant of San Casciano is absurd, because it implies the possibility of a strong state where there is missing the social life that should support it and here Machiavelli, with strange inconsistency, does not see clearly, he also laid bare the political misery of Italy, but, on the other hand, is a perfect picture, made, for whom nothing can be added. It's the quick statement, but formidable Italian history in its latest results, which will cover the Renaissance, and if there are certain times you can find, and if not, the little book, a source of historical details, come in and grabbed it done and led to the latest consequences of those individual moments that the spirit has determined and united in its progress. What was missing, this Italian civilization, most apparently, the Nicholas adds his own: his own militia, and this is the most creative act in which it appears in his life the power of his imagination. And certainly, if partial reforms of the political structures, whether by virtue of a man had been enough to save the Italian domains and the fortune of our civilization, in Prince effect can be found in the rules of salvation.
From the foreword by Federico Chabod
0 comments:
Post a Comment